Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Holiday

Citations

  • 954 A.2d 6
  • 2008 Pa. Super. 141
  • 2008 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1461

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the sentencing guidelines “have no binding effect, create no presumption in sentencing, and do not predominate over other sentencing factors” (citation omitted)
  • stating that a claim that the sentencing court imposed a sentence outside of the guidelines, without specifying sufficient reasons, presents a substantial question
  • stating that Appellant was born in Germany but has not lived there since he was a child
  • stating that “[a] claim that the sentencing court imposed a sentence outside of the guidelines without specifying sufficient reasons presents a substantial question for our review.”
  • stating that “[a] claim that the sentencing court imposed a sentence outside of the guidelines without specifying sufficient reasons presents a substantial question for our review.”
  • stating that “[a] claim that the sentencing court imposed a sentence outside of the guidelines without specifying sufficient reasons presents a substantial question for our review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green, Lally, Panella, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.