United States v. George Gillette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an attorney’s affidavit that does not allege personal knowledge of disputed facts is inadequate to justify a suppression hearing
• upholding the denial of an evidentiary hearing where the affidavit submitted failed to allege personal knowledge
• finding no abuse of discretion where court refused to ask jury panel whether legal principles of reasonable doubt and presumption of innocence were understood
• finding that affidavit of defendant’s attorney, who did not have personal knowledge of the facts attested to, did not raise a material issue of fact sufficient to justify a hearing, where the affidavit for the search warrant supported a finding of probable cause
• an attorney’s affidavit that does not allege personal knowledge of disputed facts is inadequate to justify a suppression hearing
• attorney’s affidavit that does not allege personal knowledge of the disputed facts is inadequate to warrant a suppression hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).