Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Green

Citations

  • 168 A.3d 180
  • 2017 Pa. Super. 244
  • 2017 WL 3139986
  • 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 571

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a dog’s indication, alone, was sufficient to elevate an officer’s reasonable suspicion to probable cause
  • holding that a combination of factors were sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion, including observed nervous behavior, the officer’s prior knowledge regarding drug corridor routes, and prior convictions for “assault and drug offenses”
  • holding that a police officer’s reasonable suspicion that a vehicle contained drugs ripened into probable cause to search the vehicle without a warrant when a canine’s sniff search positively alerted to the presence of narcotics inside the vehicle
  • “Q. He indicated to you he was authorized to drive it? A. Yes.”
  • applying Gary to the review of search of car

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shogan, Moulton, Platt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.