Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 6/8/1993
Commonwealth v. Martin
Citations
- 626 A.2d 556
- 534 Pa. 136
- 1993 Pa. LEXIS 142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that probable cause is required when a dog sniff is performed on a person
- holding that, under enhanced privacy protections of Article I, Section 8, a canine sniff of a person is a search and requires probable cause and a search warrant
- holding that a K-9 sniff of the exterior of an automobile is a search that must be supported by reasonable suspicion
- explaining that a search of a person always involves a greater degree of intrusion upon the person's privacy interest than the search of a thing
- explaining that a search of a person always involves a greater degree of intrusion upon the person’s privacy interest than the search of a thing
- explaining that a search of a person always involves a greater degree of intrusion upon the person’s privacy interest than the search of a thing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nix, C.J., and Larsen, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy and Montemuro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-26· cited 208×
- Commonwealth v. RogersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-05-27· cited 167×
- Jones v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-01-25· cited 104×
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 74×
- State v. TackittMontana Supreme Court· 2003-04-15· cited 66×
- State v. OrtizNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-10-01· cited 58×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-04-23· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. DeBlaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-29· cited 49×
- Myers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-12-21· cited 41×
- Theodore v. Delaware Valley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-20· cited 40×
- Commonwealth v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-04-25· cited 38×
- In the Interest of B.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-10-10· cited 34×
- State v. WazSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-04-15· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-07-25· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. RosenfeltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-11· cited 32×
- Padilla v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-05-30· cited 31×
- In the Interest of F.B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-03-02· cited 26×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2002-05-02· cited 25×
- State v. HardestyArizona Supreme Court· 2009-09-08· cited 19×
- State v. Juarez-GodinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-07-26· cited 19×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 2,425×
- Soldal v. Cook CountySupreme Court· 1992-12-08· cited 1,151×
- Commonwealth v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-08-05· cited 142×
- Commonwealth v. TrengeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-01· cited 82×
- United States v. John Christopher BealeNinth Circuit· 1984-07-20· cited 65×
- United States v. John Christopher BealeNinth Circuit· 1982-04-22· cited 49×
- United States v. BealeSupreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.