Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Chambers

Citations

  • 55 A.3d 1208
  • 2012 Pa. Super. 202
  • 2012 WL 4320457
  • 2012 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2519

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding no reasonable suspicion existed where the defendant was walking on a street in a high-crime area and took a step back after a probation officer called out his name
  • stating probationers’ and parolees’ Fourth Amendment constitutional rights are virtually indistinguishable
  • “To institute an investigative detention, an officer must have at least a reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Gantman, Mundy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.