Commonwealth v. Gonzalez-Dejusus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim that an aggregate sentence involving the imposition of consecutive sentences was excessive was a challenge to the discretionary aspects of sentencing
• explaining that a claim that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences is a challenge to the discretionary aspects of a sentence
• explaining that a challenge to the imposition of consecutive sentences implicates the discretionary aspects of sentencing
• holding consecutive sentences amounting to 20 to 40 years of incarceration for kidnapping, robbery, and conspiracy did not raise a substantial question
• acknowledging that a claim that an aggregate sentence was excessive after court imposed consecutive sentences challenges the discretionary aspects of a sentence
• explaining that a challenge to the imposition of consecutive sentences implicates the discretionary aspects of sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).