Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/20/2010

Commonwealth v. Gonzalez-Dejusus

Citations

994 A.2d 595
2010 Pa. Super. 62
2010 Pa. Super. LEXIS 324

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a claim that an aggregate sentence involving the imposition of consecutive sentences was excessive was a challenge to the discretionary aspects of sentencing
explaining that a claim that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences is a challenge to the discretionary aspects of a sentence
explaining that a challenge to the imposition of consecutive sentences implicates the discretionary aspects of sentencing
holding consecutive sentences amounting to 20 to 40 years of incarceration for kidnapping, robbery, and conspiracy did not raise a substantial question
acknowledging that a claim that an aggregate sentence was excessive after court imposed consecutive sentences challenges the discretionary aspects of a sentence
explaining that a challenge to the imposition of consecutive sentences implicates the discretionary aspects of sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.