Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Citations

  • 873 A.2d 704
  • 2005 Pa. Super. 108
  • 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 408

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the imposition of the statutory maximum does not constitute an abuse of discretion where the appellant has “clearly shown a refusal to change his dangerous criminal behavior”
  • noting that challenges to the trial court's discretion to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences ordinarily does not raise a substantial question
  • noting that challenges to the trial court’s discretion to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences ordinarily does not raise a substantial question
  • noting that challenges to the trial court’s discretion to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences ordinarily does not raise a substantial question
  • noting that challenges to the trial court's discretion to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences ordinarily does not raise a substantial question
  • noting that challenges to the trial court’s discretion to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences ordinarily does not raise a substantial question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joyce, Todd, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.