Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 11/28/2007

Commonwealth v. Floyd

Citations

937 A.2d 494
2007 Pa. Super. 353
2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3917

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

discussing Tyler and noting that the trial court in Tyler was “essentially prevent[ed] . . . from inquiring into the underpinnings of the defendant’s complaints”
collecting cases; affirming finding that disagreement in trial strategy and perceived deficits in counsel’s representation did not rise to the level of irreconcilable differences
collecting cases; affirming finding that disagreement in trial strategy and -6- J-S65034-18 perceived deficits in counsel’s representation did not rise to the level of irreconcilable differences
“[T]he right to appointed counsel does not include the right to counsel of the defendant’s choice.” (citation omitted)
“[T]he right to appointed counsel does not include the right to counsel of the defendant’s choice.”
appointment of new counsel not warranted where defendant merely alleges difference of opinion in trial strategy, defendant lacks confidence in counsel’s ability, or defendant alleges strained relationship with counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, McCaffery, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.