Skip to main content
· 1/30/1985

Commonwealth v. Chew

Citations

  • 487 A.2d 1379
  • 338 Pa. Super. 472
  • 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5685

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • mere difference of opinion concerning trial strategy or brevity of pre-trial communications does not compel the appointment of new counsel
  • mere difference of opinion concerning trial strategy or brevity of pre-trial communications does not compel the appointment of new counsel
  • failure to make timely objection to appearing shackled in leg irons before jury
  • appeal not filed in this case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Johnson, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.