Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Druce

Citations

  • 796 A.2d 321
  • 2002 Pa. Super. 70
  • 2002 Pa. Super. LEXIS 283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding appellant raised a substantial question by alleging the trial judge imposed a sentence “not based on evidence that was presented to him but based on comments reportedly made by [appellant] to a newspaper[.]”
  • stating a claim that the sentencing court -4- J-S24010-25 relied on matters not of record in fashioning its sentence raises a substantial question
  • an allegation that the trial court relied on matters not of record during sentencing raises a substantial question
  • “[A] defendant is entitled to sentencing by a judge whose impartiality cannot reasonably be questioned.”
  • claim that sentencing court relied on evidence not of record raised a substantial question
  • claim trial court relied on evidence -5- J-S69035-19 not of record raised substantial question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Stevens, Beck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.