Commonwealth v. Karash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in sentencing defendant for burglary, court should not have referred to escape for which defendant had not been charged
• in sentencing defendant for burglary, court should not have referred to escape for which defendant had not been charged
• in sentencing defendant for burglary, court should not have referred to escape for which defendant had not been charged
• trial court properly disclosed information it viewed on television regarding the defendant but improperly considered the television news story when the defendant denied the allegations contained therein

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Downing
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-02-23· cited 273×
• Com. v. Bowens, T.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-10-19· cited 81×
• Commonwealth v. Rhodes
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-31· cited 53×
• Commonwealth v. Druce
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-03-15· cited 31×
• Commonwealth v. Sypin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-19· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Chase
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-08-19· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Pfender
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-04-04· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. Mullins
  Bucks County Court of Common Pleas· 2005-10-06

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Tucker
  Supreme Court· 1972-01-11· cited 2,508×
• Commonwealth v. Bethea
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-28· cited 119×
• Commonwealth v. Schwartz
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-02-01· cited 43×
• Commonwealth v. Cruz
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-04-20· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Schwartz
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-06-15· cited 23×
• Reeder v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1911-05-17· cited 17×