Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Bryant

Citations

  • 476 A.2d 422
  • 328 Pa. Super. 1
  • 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4523

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing allegation that trial judge had pre-determined appellant’s sentence in prior cases for political purposes could be basis for disqualification
  • remanding case for resentencing before a different judge where sentencing judge’s in camera remarks in a prior case showed his predetermination to impose maximum sentence and defendant filed a motion for recusal
  • “A judge is not automatically disqualified from hearing a case merely because he has presided over prior cases involving the same defendant.”
  • judicial conduct is governed by the precept of avoiding not only actual impropriety, but even the appearance of impropriety
  • remanded for resentencing before different judge where sentencing judge’s in camera remarks in prior case showed predetermination to impose maximum sentence
  • remanded for resentencing before different judge where sentencing judge's in camera remarks in prior case showed predetermination to impose maximum sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Brosky, Beck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.