· 10/12/2001
Commonwealth v. Kenner
Citations
- 784 A.2d 808
- 2001 Pa. Super. 292
- 2001 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2715
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Commonwealth raised a substantial question where it alleged that defendant’s sentence was excessively lenient, and provided specific reasons why the sentence violated sentencing norms
- holding that the Commonwealth raised a substantial question where it alleged defendant’s sentence was excessively lenient and provided specific reasons why the sentence violated sentencing norms
- holding that the Commonwealth raised a substantial question where it alleged the sentence was excessively lenient and provided specific reasons why the sentence violated sentencing norms
- holding that the Commonwealth raised a substantial question where it alleged defendant’s sentence was excessively lenient and provided specific reasons why the sentence violated sentencing norms
- holding that the Commonwealth raised a substantial question where it alleged that defendant’s sentence was excessively lenient, and provided specific reasons why the sentence violated sentencing norms
- holding that the Commonwealth raised a substantial question where it alleged that defendant’s sentence was excessively lenient, and provided specific reasons why the sentence violated sentencing norms
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanaugh, Eakin, Joyce
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.