Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 11/22/2017
Commonwealth v. Derhammer, J., Aplt.
Citations
- 173 A.3d 723
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when SORNA became effective in 2012, Megan’s Law III was no longer effective
- holding that the Commonwealth lacked authority to prosecute a defendant for violating Section 4915 after Megan’s Law III was struck down by Neiman
- holding that appellant could not be prosecuted for violating the registration requirements of Megan’s Law III because, at the time of his trial, Megan’s Law III had been voided as unconstitutional
- holding that Derhammer could not be prosecuted for violating the registration requirements of Megan’s Law III because, at the time of his trial, Megan’s Law III had been voided as unconstitutional
- explaining that the courts are not authorized to insert words into a statute
- explaining that the courts are not authorized to insert words into a statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Saylor, Baer, Todd, Donohue, Dougherty, Wecht, Mundy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. GrecoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-02-08· cited 71×
- Commonwealth v. HorningSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-07-11· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. FernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-09-05· cited 30×
- Com. v. Hagan, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-12-06· cited 23×
- Com. v. Zack, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-08-17· cited 7×
- In Re Fortieth Statewide Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-08-21· cited 5×
- Com. v. Zeno, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-05-07· cited 5×
- Com. v. Barger, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-10-02· cited 1×
- Dana Holding Corp., Aplt. v. WCAB (Smuck)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-06-16
- Commonwealth v. McIntyre, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-06-16
- Woodford, M., Aplts. v. PA Insurance Dept.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-12-22
- Commonwealth v. Eid, K., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-04-29
- Com. v. Downward, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-03-14
- Com. v. Stanley, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-07-08
- Commonwealth v. Roberts, W., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-01-22
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-07-19· cited 899×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-25· cited 383×
- Bell v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 326×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-30· cited 255×
- Commonwealth v. NeimanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-16· cited 231×
- In the Interest of J.B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-29· cited 152×
- Burke, A., Aplt. v. Independence Blue CrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-10-31· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. ShaferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-07-01· cited 48×
- Matter of DandridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-05-13· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. NeimanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-09-08· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. BangsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-20· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. DerhammerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-02-16· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. Derhammer, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-12-27· cited 2×
Other cases named Commonwealth v. Derhammer, J., Aplt.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.