Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Derhammer, J., Aplt.

Citations

  • 173 A.3d 723

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when SORNA became effective in 2012, Megan’s Law III was no longer effective
  • holding that the Commonwealth lacked authority to prosecute a defendant for violating Section 4915 after Megan’s Law III was struck down by Neiman
  • holding that appellant could not be prosecuted for violating the registration requirements of Megan’s Law III because, at the time of his trial, Megan’s Law III had been voided as unconstitutional
  • holding that Derhammer could not be prosecuted for violating the registration requirements of Megan’s Law III because, at the time of his trial, Megan’s Law III had been voided as unconstitutional
  • explaining that the courts are not authorized to insert words into a statute
  • explaining that the courts are not authorized to insert words into a statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saylor, Baer, Todd, Donohue, Dougherty, Wecht, Mundy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Derhammer, J., Aplt.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.