Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Williams

Citations

  • 832 A.2d 962
  • 574 Pa. 487
  • 2003 Pa. LEXIS 1746

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that criminal penalties imposed for violating Pennsylvania’s Registration of Sexual Offenders Act were unconstitutionally punitive
  • holding that Megan’s Law II as applied to SVPs is not excessive, at least not by the “clearest proof”
  • holding that the registration, notification, and counseling provisions of Megan’s Law II do not constitute criminal punishment except for the penalty provisions of sections 9795.2(d)(2) and 9796(e)(2
  • holding certain penalties that applied to noncompliant SVP unconstitutional, but determining that those provisions could be severed from the rest of Megan's Law II
  • noting that Williams challenged the provision following the trial court’s order directing the SOAB to assess Williams
  • holding that provisions in a prior version of SORNA were not punitive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Former

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

201 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.