Burke, A., Aplt. v. Independence Blue Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court may not, under the guise of statutory construction, rewrite a statutory provision
• holding that the court may not, under the guise of statutory construction, rewrite a statutory provision
• holding that the court may not, under the guise of statutory construction, rewrite a statutory provision
• holding that exceptions to the mootness doctrine exist for issues that are, inter alia, capable of repetition while evading review
• stating that challenges to a party’s standing must be raised before the trial court or they are waived
• providing that “we are mindful of the precept that courts cannot insert words into a statute. Thus, we may not, under the guise of statutory construction, simply rewrite [the statute].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).