Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/8/2019

Commonwealth v. Greco

Citations

203 A.3d 1120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a post-conviction claim that an original sentence is illegal due to the retroactive application of a sexual offender registration requirement must be raised in a PCRA petition
holding that claims challenging application of SORNA’s registration provisions and “invocation of Muniz implicate[] the legality of [the] sentence, which is an issue cognizable under the PCRA and, therefore, subject to the PCRA’s timeliness requirements”
holding declaration that defendant was not subject to SORNA was an untimely request for PCRA relief
explaining that “claims challenging applications of SORNA’s registration provisions – unlike prior versions of Megan’s Law – are properly considered under the PCRA”
applying Murphy and holding “the rule recognized in Muniz does not establish a timeliness exception to the PCRA”
vacating and remanding case where trial court entertained untimely PCRA petition stating that defendant did not have to comply with SORNA requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, McLaughlin, Strassburger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.