Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Davis

Citations

  • 176 A.3d 869

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant's act of providing the password to his computer was not testimonial where the Commonwealth had already established the (continued
  • holding that the foregone conclusion doctrine applied where the state was able to show that it knew that the passcode existed, it was within the defendant's possession or control, and was authentic
  • recognizing that this Court may raise the issue of jurisdiction sua sponte
  • recognizing that this Court may raise the issue of jurisdiction sua sponte
  • recognizing that this Court may raise the issue of jurisdiction sua sponte
  • act of providing passcode is not testimonial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gantman, Pánella, Elliott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.