Commonwealth v. Knoble

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “if a witness under compulsion to testify makes disclosures instead of claiming the privilege, the government has not ‘compelled’ him to incriminate himself”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Cooley, III, N., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-06-15· cited 49×
• Verloic, G. v. Doe, J.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-09-14· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Davis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-11-30· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Melvin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-11-06· cited 11×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Gagnon v. Scarpelli
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
• Minnesota v. Murphy
  Supreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 1,569×
• Lefkowitz v. Cunningham
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-13· cited 598×
• Garner v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1976-03-23· cited 531×
• United States v. Monia
  Supreme Court· 1943-02-08· cited 413×
• Commonwealth v. Arroyo
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-01-21· cited 99×
• Commonwealth v. Saranchak
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-01-19· cited 88×
• Commonwealth v. Patton
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-30· cited 26×
• Commonwealth v. Shrawder
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-31· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. KNOBLE
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-02-03· cited 2×
• Com. v. KNOBLE
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-06-24· cited 1×