Commonwealth v. Counterman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• one year period between majority of pretrial publicity and trial was sufficient to dissipate effects of pretrial publicity
• no I· I! prejudice when late disclosure of exculpatory evidence did not impair defendant's ability to .1; present evidence at issue
• “It is true that, after being criticized by the Commonwealth for these lapses, Dunn attempts to provide some such detail in his reply brief.”
• “no particular period of premeditation is required to form the requisite intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).