Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Cunningham

Citations

  • 370 A.2d 1172
  • 471 Pa. 577
  • 1977 Pa. LEXIS 612

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence of coercive circumstances surrounding a prior statement was properly deemed irrelevant where the statement challenged by the defendant had been “purged of any prior illegality”
  • holding that evidence of coercive circumstances surrounding a prior statement was properly deemed irrelevant where the statement challenged by the defendant had been \purged of any prior illegality\
  • holding that interview was - 36 - J-S50026-20 not involuntary and noting that “[m]ost significant is the fact that counsel was present and was available to detect and describe even the most subtle coercive and suggestive influences if they in fact had existed”
  • holding that interview was - 36 - J-S50026-20 not involuntary and noting that “[m]ost significant is the fact that counsel was present and was available to detect and describe even the most subtle coercive and suggestive influences if they in fact had existed”
  • noting that a criminal defendant’s consultation with counsel was “an attenuating occurrence” and reliance on counsel’s advice to reaffirm confession after a lengthy, uncounseled police interrogation reinforced the voluntariness of the statement
  • a counselled interrogation preceded by an adequate opportunity to confer with counsel is the kind of attenuating circumstance that dissipates a prior illegality

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.