George Jones M-2329 v. Charles Zimmerman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that habeas challenge that would affect only one of two concurrent counts need not be reached under concurrent sentence doctrine
• “The practice is eminently practical and conserves judicial resources for more pressing needs.”
• impaired parole eligibility is basis for not applying the collateral sentence doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).