Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2/25/1999
Commonwealth v. Cross
Citations
- 726 A.2d 333
- 555 Pa. 603
- 1999 Pa. LEXIS 526
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that instructions similar to the instant ones did not violate Mills
- explaining that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court may formulate their own interpretation of the U.S. Constitution and of the Supreme Court precedent
- this Court not bound by a Third Circuit decision interpreting United States Supreme Court jurisprudence
- this Court not bound by a Third Circuit decision interpreting United States Supreme Court jurisprudence
- this Court not bound by a Third Circuit decision interpreting United States Supreme Court jurisprudence
- this Court not bound by a Third Circuit decision interpreting United States Supreme Court jurisprudence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. Gamboa-TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-06-19· cited 603×
- Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-12-21· cited 218×
- Commonwealth v. Hicks, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-05-31· cited 195×
- Commonwealth v. FletcherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-28· cited 172×
- Szuchon v. LehmanThird Circuit· 2001-11-20· cited 153×
- Commonwealth v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-05-01· cited 94×
- Commonwealth v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-12-22· cited 80×
- Banks v. HornThird Circuit· 2001-10-31· cited 76×
- Stone Crushed Partnership v. Kassab Archbold Jackson & O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-10-17· cited 69×
- Hall v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-06-22· cited 57×
- Com. of Pa. v. RomeroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-04-26· cited 52×
- Hackett v. PriceThird Circuit· 2004-08-26· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. BaldwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-31· cited 44×
- Bryan v. FawkesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2014-10-24· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-11-19· cited 37×
- Meggett v. Pennsylvania Dept. of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-04-24· cited 23×
- Cash Distributing Co., Inc. v. NeelyMississippi Supreme Court· 2007-01-25· cited 20×
- Hughley v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2014-10-01· cited 16×
- Holman v. GillisE.D. Pennsylvania· 1999-07-21· cited 12×
- Thomas v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-06-28· cited 11×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1997-03-03· cited 2,323×
- Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-04-23· cited 1,983×
- Mills v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,392×
- Blystone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1990-02-28· cited 551×
- Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-12-21· cited 447×
- Buchanan v. AngeloneSupreme Court· 1998-01-21· cited 353×
- Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-10-12· cited 105×
- Roderick Herman Frey v. Thomas A. Fulcomer, Warden, State Correctional Institution at HuntingdonThird Circuit· 1997-12-30· cited 85×
- Commonwealth v. CrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-05· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. GillespieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-28· cited 55×
- Gavle v. Little Six, Inc.Supreme Court· 1998-06-01· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. HackettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-06-30· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. CrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-08-14· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.