Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Baldwin

Citations

  • 789 A.2d 728
  • 2001 Pa. Super. 383
  • 2001 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[n]either the court system nor the correctional system is obliged to educate or update prisoners concerning changes in case law.”
  • explaining that a petitioner’s lack of prior knowledge of a newly decided case does not excuse a failure to file a timely PCRA petition
  • reiterating that PCRA petition claiming exception to timeliness requirement based upon constitutional right newly recognized by United States Supreme Court or Pennsylvania Supreme Court must be presented within sixty days of newly published decision
  • stating sixty-day period begins to run upon date of judicial decision
  • “Neither the court system nor the correctional system is obliged to educate or update prisoners concerning changes in case law.”
  • “Neither the court system nor the correctional system is obliged to educate or update prisoners concerning changes in case law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Hudock, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.