Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Cross

Citations

  • 496 A.2d 1144
  • 508 Pa. 322
  • 1985 Pa. LEXIS 395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the defendant’s clothing and personal effects could properly be seized following a lawful arrest
  • finding that the (d)(10) aggravating circumstance, which includes the circumstances of multiple murders, is not “arbitrary and capricious”
  • finding that the (d)(10) aggravating circumstance, which includes the circumstances of multiple murders, is not \arbitrary and capricious\
  • upholding the “warrant-less seizure of [an arrestee’s] hair samples and [] fingernail clippings and scrapings” as valid incident to arrest because “their seizure was so minor an imposition as to constitute only the slightest intrusion, if indeed such constituted an intrusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.