Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 8/14/1985
Commonwealth v. Cross
Citations
- 496 A.2d 1144
- 508 Pa. 322
- 1985 Pa. LEXIS 395
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the defendant’s clothing and personal effects could properly be seized following a lawful arrest
- finding that the (d)(10) aggravating circumstance, which includes the circumstances of multiple murders, is not “arbitrary and capricious”
- finding that the (d)(10) aggravating circumstance, which includes the circumstances of multiple murders, is not \arbitrary and capricious\
- upholding the “warrant-less seizure of [an arrestee’s] hair samples and [] fingernail clippings and scrapings” as valid incident to arrest because “their seizure was so minor an imposition as to constitute only the slightest intrusion, if indeed such constituted an intrusion”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Zettlemoyer v. FulcomerThird Circuit· 1991-01-16· cited 218×
- Commonwealth v. BaumhammersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-05-27· cited 187×
- Commonwealth v. CopenheferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-28· cited 132×
- Commonwealth v. FletcherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-11-18· cited 119×
- Commonwealth v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-10-04· cited 114×
- Commonwealth v. ZookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-17· cited 102×
- Commonwealth v. FreySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-02-03· cited 81×
- Commonwealth v. Johnson, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-05-26· cited 79×
- Commonwealth v. CrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-05· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. DuffeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-14· cited 69×
- Commonwealth v. SimonsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-09-12· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. Cam LySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-03-18· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. CrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-02-25· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-04-06· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. SwegerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-02-26· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. MoserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-14· cited 22×
- Peterkin v. JeffesE.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-05-04· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. HowardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-05-30· cited 19×
- Zettlemoyer v. FulcomerThird Circuit· 1991-03-20· cited 2×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,907×
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 2,410×
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,349×
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,034×
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-03-23· cited 1,905×
- Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 1,798×
- Godfrey v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1980-05-19· cited 1,672×
- Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 1,061×
- United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court· 1974-03-26· cited 917×
- Roberts v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1976-10-12· cited 802×
- Commonwealth v. ZettlemoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-30· cited 709×
- Commonwealth v. FreySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-13· cited 262×
- Pioneer Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1983-08-23· cited 229×
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-29· cited 202×
- United States v. Ralph F. DeleoFirst Circuit· 1970-04-20· cited 199×
- Commonwealth v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-05-24· cited 113×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.