Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Cook

Citations

  • 175 A.3d 345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, on appeal following remand for the correction of an illegal sentence, appellant could not raise challenges to guilt phase of trial
  • stating that where a discretionary sentencing claim is not preserved, it is waived and, therefore, frivolous on direct appeal, even in the Anders/Santiago context
  • providing that raising waived issues on appeal would be frivolous
  • confining review to counsel’s Anders brief and the appellant’s pro se filing where the appellant submits a response to the Anders brief
  • reviewing pro se response only after determining that the issues raised in the Anders brief were frivolous
  • forbidding appellant only from litigating claims that fell outside scope of remand after resentencing to correct illegal sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lazarus, Dubow, Strassburger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.