Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Anderson

Citations

  • 801 A.2d 1264
  • 2002 Pa. Super. 204
  • 2002 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, on direct review following remand for resentencing, the only issues subject to appellate scrutiny are challenges to the sentence imposed on remand
  • reiterating that, “having been re-sentenced following remand, appellant could not file another direct appeal attacking his conviction: the only issues reviewable in a direct appeal would be challenges to the sentence imposed following remand”
  • dismissing an appeal following remand for resentencing where an appellant raised new issues on appeal challenging his conviction
  • limiting scope of direct appeal, following remand, to only challenges related to newly imposed sentence
  • finding a defendant may only raise “issues reviewable in a direct appeal [that] would be challenges to the sentence imposed . . . .”
  • “[H]aving been re-sentenced following remand, appellant could not file another direct appeal attacking his conviction: the only issues reviewable in a direct appeal would be challenges to the sentence imposed following remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Bowes, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.