Skip to main content
· 10/10/2007

Commonwealth v. Wrecks

Citations

  • 934 A.2d 1287
  • 2007 Pa. Super. 301
  • 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that any filing which requests relief outside the PCRA will not be treated as a PCRA petition
  • concluding that counsel’s petition to withdraw “substantially, if not perfectly, complies with Anders”
  • explaining that requests for relief with respect to discretionary aspects of sentence are not cognizable in PCRA proceedings
  • explaining that requests for relief with respect to discretionary aspects of sentence are not cognizable in PCRA proceedings
  • explaining that requests for relief with respect to discretionary aspects of sentence are not cognizable in PCRA proceedings
  • explaining that requests for relief with respect to discretionary aspects of sentence are not cognizable in PCRA proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colville, Daniels, Joyce

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.