Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 11/20/1996

Commonwealth v. Chambers

Citations

685 A.2d 96
546 Pa. 370
1996 Pa. LEXIS 2299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that application of Section 9711(h) as amended did not deprive appellant of any constitutional right
holding that application of Section 9711(h) as amended did not deprive appellant of any constitutional right
holding trial court may properly refuse to excuse a juror for cause when the trial judge believes that the juror would be fair and impartial
stating that the decision of whether to permit a party to recall witnesses and present additional evidence is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion
finding no abuse of discretion where the trial court in a jury trial permitted the Commonwealth to recall a witness to correct his prior testimony
court may properly refuse to excuse a juror for cause when the trial judge believes that the juror would be fair and impartial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.