Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Cannon

Citations

  • 453 Pa. 389
  • 309 A.2d 384
  • 1973 Pa. LEXIS 685

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The determination of whether a confession is the product of a rational intellect necessitates our consideration of the totality of the circumstances.”
  • evidence of the defendant’s schizophrenia did not prevent him from making a knowing, intelligent statement during a confession
  • Roberts, X, dissenting, joined by Pomeroy and Manderino, JJ.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ciuee, Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Boberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.