Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 9/19/1973
Commonwealth v. Cannon
Citations
- 453 Pa. 389
- 309 A.2d 384
- 1973 Pa. LEXIS 685
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The determination of whether a confession is the product of a rational intellect necessitates our consideration of the totality of the circumstances.”
- evidence of the defendant’s schizophrenia did not prevent him from making a knowing, intelligent statement during a confession
- Roberts, X, dissenting, joined by Pomeroy and Manderino, JJ.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ciuee, Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Boberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. O'SEAROSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-01-29· cited 219×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-05-02· cited 148×
- Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-21· cited 120×
- Commonwealth v. EnglandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-07-08· cited 119×
- Leroy Brown v. Julius T. Cuyler, Supt., at S.C.I.G.Third Circuit· 1982-01-29· cited 97×
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-01-29· cited 81×
- Commonwealth v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-11-17· cited 80×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-01-28· cited 78×
- Commonwealth v. RawlesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-01· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. CainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-01-28· cited 71×
- Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 70×
- United States ex rel. Matthews v. JohnsonThird Circuit· 1974-08-15· cited 66×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-08· cited 48×
- State v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court· 1975-06-05· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-02-28· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-12-23· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. LondonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-05-13· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. CephasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-04· cited 29×
- State v. RocheleauSupreme Court of Vermont· 1973-12-04· cited 28×
- State v. OliveraHawaii Supreme Court· 1976-10-28· cited 26×
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 4,485×
- Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1960-01-11· cited 1,191×
- Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 986×
- Lynumn v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1963-03-25· cited 792×
- Commonwealth v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-12-29· cited 132×
- Commonwealth v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-07-02· cited 114×
- Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-12-31· cited 112×
- Commonwealth v. KenneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-30· cited 101×
- Commonwealth v. WinebrennerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-04-28· cited 81×
- Commonwealth v. HoltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-10-11· cited 71×
- Commonwealth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-07-02· cited 71×
- Commonwealth v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-04-22· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. FrazierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-06-04· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. PavillardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-06-24· cited 59×
- Commonwealth v. AbramsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-06-28· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. KellyonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1923-06-23· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. PearsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-16· cited 46×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Gaito v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-06-24· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.