Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Gibson

Citations

  • 720 A.2d 473
  • 553 Pa. 648
  • 1998 Pa. LEXIS 2501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the test for custodial interrogation does not depend on the subjective intent of the police
  • holding that voluntary statements that are not responsive to any queries are admissible
  • holding that voluntary statements that are not responsive to any questions are admissible
  • repeating that “[i]t is well settled that a gratuitous utterance, unsolicited by the police, is admissible and that Miranda warnings are unnecessary under such circumstances”
  • observing that “[c]redibility determinations are strictly within the province of the finder of fact; therefore, an appellate court may not reweigh the evidence and substitute its judgment for that of the finder of fact.”
  • “Credibility determinations are strictly within the province of the finder of fact; therefore, an appellate court may not reweigh the evidence and substitute its judgment for that of the finder of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zapppala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.