Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Cannon

Citations

  • 22 A.3d 210
  • 610 Pa. 494
  • 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1408

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating Bruton violation may arise when prosecutor discloses to jury that co- defendant’s statement has been redacted and unequivocally identifies defendant as individual whose name was removed
  • “Thus, pursuant to Brown [I], a Bruton violation may arise when a prosecutor discloses to the jury that the co-defendant’s statement has been redacted and unequivocally identifies the defendant as the individual whose name was removed.” (emphasis added)
  • summarizing its holding in Brown

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Melvin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.