In the Interest of: N.C., Appeal of: Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that while appellate courts review trial courts’ evidentiary decisions for an abuse of discretion, whether the admission of out of court statements violates the Confrontation Clause is a question of law, reviewed de novo
• “It is undisputed that A.D.'s video-taped, forensic interview conducted at Western Pennsylvania Cares was testimonial under Crawford and its progeny[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).