Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 5/6/2013
Commonwealth v. James
Citations
- 66 A.3d 771
- 2013 Pa. Super. 106
- 2013 WL 1867112
- 2013 Pa. Super. LEXIS 716
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that no Bruton violation occurred given circumstances of the prosecutor’s misstatement and curative instruction given by the trial court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Colville, Stevens, Wecht
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-23· cited 541×
- Commonwealth v. SandersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-02-29· cited 138×
- Commonwealth v. TraversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-03-26· cited 90×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-06-26· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. CannonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-06-21· cited 29×
- Com. v. CannonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-04-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.