Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Washington

Citations

  • 700 A.2d 400
  • 549 Pa. 12
  • 1997 Pa. LEXIS 1669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was not improper for prosecutor to argue that jury should show defendant same mercy he showed victim
  • denying three challenges to the prosecutor's statements in the penalty phase on the grounds that all were reasonable inferences drawn from or reiterations of the evidence presented in the case
  • denying three challenges to the prosecutor’s statements in the penalty phase on the grounds that all were reasonable inferences drawn from or reiterations of the evidence presented in the case
  • omissions of facts from prior statements do not render them inconsistent statements for purposes of impeachment
  • prosecutor’s comments in closing argument of penalty phase were permissible where prosecutor asked jury “to give Anthony Washington the same sympathy and mercy that he showed to Tracey Lawson when he gunned him down in cold blood right between the eyes, right in the head”
  • prosecutor’s comments in closing arguments of penalty phase were permissible where prosecutor asked jury “to give Anthony Washington the same sympathy and mercy that he showed to Tracey Lawson when he gunned him down in cold blood right between the eyes, right in the head”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Castille, Flaherty, Newman, Nigro, Zappala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.