Commonwealth v. Dotzman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• substantial question raised as to whether sentence is appropriate under the sentencing guidelines where trial court held inapplicable the provisions of 204 Pa.Code § 303.4
• “The court’s discretion comes into play in imposing sentence, only after it has determined the proper sentencing guideline range.”
• the Commonwealth raised substantial question as to appropriateness of the sentence as a result of the trial court’s finding that the deadly weapon enhancement was inapplicable to the defendant, who committed first-degree robbery at knife-point
• the Commonwealth raised substantial question as to appropriateness of the sentence as a result of the trial court's finding that the deadly weapon enhancement was inapplicable to the defendant, who committed first-degree robbery at knife-point

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).