Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Bennett

Citations

  • 57 A.3d 1185
  • 618 Pa. 553
  • 2012 Pa. LEXIS 3010

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “counsel will not be faulted for failing to predict change in the law”
  • recognizing that “counsel will not be faulted for failing to predict change in the law.”
  • recognizing \counsel will not be faulted for failing to predict a change in the law.\
  • “[I]n light of [Attorney] Lang’s opening argument[, the court wi]ll allow some leeway. Don’t go too far.”
  • “[C]ounsel will not be faulted for failing to predict a change in the law.”
  • “the charge, when read in its entirety, appropriately conveys that an accomplice or co-conspirator must possess the specific intent to kill in order to be found guilty of first-degree murder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer, Castille, Eakin, McCaffery, Melvin, Saylor, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.