Schultz v. MMI Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the failure of three defendants to object to venue did not waive a fourth defendant’s objection and therefore affirming the trial court’s decision to transfer venue
• holding that venue was properly transferred when defendants attached affidavit to preliminary objections detailing the extent of its business in forum county and plaintiffs did not respond with factual averments rebutting that evidence
• holding that one defendant’s failure to object to improper venue does not have the effect of establishing proper venue for the remaining defendants, as it would permit one defendant to unilaterally deprive another party of an opportunity to object to an improper forum
• “[I]f there exists any proper basis for the trial court’s decision to grant the petition to transfer venue, the decision must stand.”
• “[I]t is not the responsibility of this Court to scour the record to prove that an appellant has raised an issue before the trial court, thereby preserving it for appellate review.”
• movant submitted affidavit detailing extent of its business in the forum county

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).