Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Cook

Citations

  • 941 A.2d 7
  • 2007 WL 4442546

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[a] claim that the sentencing court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines presents a substantial question.”
  • explaining that an appellant must properly preserve a challenge to the discretionary aspects of his sentence by filing a motion to reconsider and modify sentence
  • explaining that an appellant must properly preserve a challenge to the discretionary aspects of his sentence by filing a motion to reconsider and modify sentence
  • stating: “A claim that the sentencing court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines presents a substantial question”
  • stating: “A claim that the sentencing court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines presents a substantial question”
  • stating: “A prior conviction means ‘previously convicted’ as defined in 42 Pa.C.S. § 2154(a)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Panella, Colville

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.