Commonwealth v. Eby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a] claim that the sentencing court imposed an unreasonable sentence by sentencing outside the guidelines presents a ‘substantial question’ for our review”
• explaining that the courts of this Commonwealth have found that a “claim that the sentencing court imposed an unreasonable sentence by sentencing outside the guideline ranges presents a substantial question for our review” (citations and quotation marks omitted)
• reiterating that “the sentencing judge must state of record the factual basis and specific reasons which compelled him or her to deviate from the guideline ranges. When evaluating a claim of this type, it is necessary to remember that the sentencing guidelines are advisory only.”
• claim that the sentencing court imposed an unreasonable sentence by sentencing outside the guideline ranges presents a substantial question
• “A claim that the sentencing court imposed an unreasonable sentence by sentencing outside the guidelines presents a ‘substantial question’ for our review.”
• “A claim that the sentencing court imposed an unreasonable sentence by sentencing outside the guidelines presents a ‘substantial question’ for our review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).