Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1/28/2011
Commonwealth v. Adams
Citations
- 458 Mass. 766
- 941 N.E.2d 1127
- 2011 Mass. LEXIS 18
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he degree of force used must be reasonable in the circumstances, with proportionality being the touchstone for assessing reasonableness.”
- “[T]he degree of force used must be reasonable in the circumstances, with proportionality being the touchstone for assessing reasonableness.”
- “Defense of another tracks, and is interwoven with, the elements of self-defense”
- “Defense of another tracks, and is interwoven with, the elements of self-defense”
- elements of defense of another track those of self-defense
- delineating elements of self-defense where nondeadly force is used
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2011-09-21· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. GomesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2015-01-12· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-01-03· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-08-06· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. AriasMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2013-10-30· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-10-22· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. HerndonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2016-08-26· cited 6×
- COMMONWEALTH v. TIMOTHY M. LAVIN (and ten companion cases ).Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2022-06-23· cited 6×
- State v. JenningsUtah Supreme Court· 2026-03-02· cited 1×
- Commonwealth v. HendersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2020-11-30
- Commonwealth v. DelarosaMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2017-12-28
- Commonwealth v. LeeMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-06-15
- Commonwealth v. BrumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2023-08-10
- Commonwealth v. Shondell Q. RatereeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2025-04-08
- Commonwealth v. Weber AndradeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2025-06-04
- State v. JenningsUtah Supreme Court· 2025-11-28
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-01-15· cited 357×
- People v. CuevasCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-12-26· cited 214×
- Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-09-29· cited 211×
- Commonwealth v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-01-09· cited 175×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2001-10-24· cited 130×
- Treadway v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2010-04-08· cited 117×
- Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1916-06-20· cited 97×
- Commonwealth v. WeichellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-09-02· cited 76×
- Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-02-02· cited 71×
- Commonwealth v. ColonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-05-22· cited 71×
- State v. IldefonsoHawaii Supreme Court· 1992-02-10· cited 64×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-07-20· cited 64×
- State v. WhittleUtah Supreme Court· 1999-10-08· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. Cong Duc LeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-06-02· cited 43×
- Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2009-11-05· cited 36×
- State v. ShawSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-10-19· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. BaselerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-02-14· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. CataldoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-07-26· cited 28×
- People v. SykesMichigan Court of Appeals· 1998-07-29· cited 24×
- State v. StoppleworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2003-08-20· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.