Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a car parked outside the residence in which the victim was robbed was in the presence of the victim
• noting that the trial judge was in the best position to determine whether a Remmer hearing was necessary
• noting that the trial judge was in the best position to determine whether a Remmer hearing was necessary
• finding that the gun’s location, under the vehicle’s front seat, was within the defendant’s reach
• stating thatRule 16(d)(2)’s use of the word “may” means that district court is not required to do anything when the state fails to disclose an expert
• finding a photo of victim’s maimed hand was the best evidence to show she was seriously disfigured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).