Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 25 So. 3d 264
  • 2009 Miss. LEXIS 546
  • 2009 WL 3645679

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the circuit court’s erroneous admission of statements because the statements were admissible under a different evidentiary rule and the right result was therefore reached
  • although victim’s out-of-court statements were not admissible as prior inconsistent statements for impeachment purposes, the statements were admissible for identification purposes under Rule 801(d)(1)(C)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carlson, Chandler, Dickinson, Graves, Kitchens, Lamar, Pierce, Randolph, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.