State v. Ildefonso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to hear a constitutional challenge not raised but recognizing that this court has addressed issues raised for the first time on appeal where the constitutionality of the statute is of great public import and justice required consideration of the issue
• declining to hear a constitutional challenge not raised but recognizing that this court has addressed issues raised for the first time on appeal where the constitutionality of the statute is of great public import and justice required consideration of the issue
• “Our review of the record reveals that [the defendant] did not raise this argument at trial, and thus it is deemed to have been waived.”
• \We have held that the question of the constitutionality of a statute cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.\
• “Our review of the record reveals that [the defendant] did not raise this argu ment at trial, and thus it is deemed to have been waived.” (Citing State v. Cummings, 49 Haw. 522, 423 P.2d 438 (1967).)
• due process challenge waived where not raised at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).