Supreme Court· 1/10/1989
Goldberg v. Sweet
Citations
- 488 U.S. 252
- 109 S. Ct. 582
- 102 L. Ed. 2d 607
- 1989 U.S. LEXIS 308
- 65 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1402
- 98 P.U.R.4th 263
- 57 U.S.L.W. 4070
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Illinois excise tax satisfied the Complete Auto test
- observing that “a taxpayer’s receipt of police and fire protection, the use of public roads and mass transit, and the other advantages of civilized society satisf[y] the requirement that the tax be fairly related to benefits provided by the State to the taxpayer”
- noting additionally that the dormant Commerce Clause is not designed to protect the “insider who presumably is able to complain about and change the tax through the [state] political process”
- endorsing apportionment of a tax on “large physical objects over identifiable routes, where it was practicable to keep track of the distance actually traveled within the taxing State”
- upholding tax upon the purchase of an interstate telephone call which had “many of the characteristics of a sales tax .. . [e]ven though such a retail purchase is not a purely local event since it triggers simultaneous activity in several States”
- upholding tax upon the purchase of an interstate telephone call which had \many of the characteristics of a sales tax . . . [e]ven though such a retail purchase is not a purely local event since it triggers simultaneous activity in several States\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marshall, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
231 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court· 1992-05-26· cited 685×
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1995-04-03· cited 415×
- West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. HealySupreme Court· 1994-06-17· cited 291×
- People v. Sprint Nextel Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 2015-10-20· cited 255×
- Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. WynneSupreme Court· 2015-05-18· cited 162×
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation, New Jersey Department of the TreasurySupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 158×
- Geja's Cafe v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-11-19· cited 144×
- Allegro Services, Ltd. v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-03-28· cited 137×
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Michigan Public Service CommissionSupreme Court· 2005-06-20· cited 121×
- Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-10-26· cited 119×
- Trinova Corp. v. Michigan Department of TreasurySupreme Court· 1991-02-19· cited 116×
- Brown's Furniture, Inc. v. WagnerIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-04-18· cited 102×
- Telebright Corp. v. DirectorNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2012-03-02· cited 77×
- Caterpillar, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court· 1992-07-31· cited 67×
- White v. Reynolds Metals Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1989-12-21· cited 62×
- Fluor Enterprises, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court· 2007-05-02· cited 58×
- W.R. Grace & Co. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court· 1999-04-01· cited 54×
- Orvis Co. v. Tax Appeals TribunalNew York Court of Appeals· 1995-06-14· cited 46×
- Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. City of Superior, WisconsinSeventh Circuit· 1991-05-20· cited 44×
- Stryker Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2001-06-14· cited 44×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court· 1977-04-18· cited 1,211×
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1981-05-26· cited 1,191×
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 606×
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 579×
- Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court· 1938-02-28· cited 490×
- Wardair Canada Inc. v. Florida Department of RevenueSupreme Court· 1986-06-18· cited 458×
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court· 1980-03-19· cited 395×
- Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court· 1977-01-12· cited 387×
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 384×
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District of Columbia· 1983-02-28· cited 379×
- Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 375×
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. BairSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 361×
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court· 1951-03-26· cited 338×
- Maryland v. United States Tandy Corporation v. United States North American Telephone Association v. United States Illinois v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-02-28· cited 324×
- National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 313×
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. ScheinerSupreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 290×
- McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1940-01-29· cited 284×
- Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Washington State Department of RevenueSupreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 283×
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court· 1944-05-15· cited 261×
- Armco Inc. v. HardestySupreme Court· 1984-10-09· cited 247×
Other cases named Goldberg v. Sweet
10 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court· 1988-02-22
- Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court· 1988-02-22
- Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court· 1988-05-31
- Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court· 1988-05-31
- Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court· 1988-09-15
- Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court· 1988-09-15
- Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court· 1988-12-05
- Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court· 1988-12-05
- Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court· 1989-01-09
- Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court· 1989-01-09
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.