Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 8/26/1994

Comer v. Cisneros

Citations

  • 37 F.3d 775
  • 1994 WL 467285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “class certification will preserve an otherwise moot claim”
  • reversing denial of class certification in housing discrimination case, holding that certification would be deemed to relate back to filing of complaint in view of the \transitory nature of the public housing market\
  • discussing general principles of standing, including constitutional minima and prudential concerns
  • interpreting Jacksonville to require allegation of a government-erected barrier to establish standing
  • “with respect to the FHA claims, we accord the RAC plaintiffs ... the broadest possible grounds for standing”
  • “In short, each named plaintiff has standing to bring suit against the RAC defendants pursuant to the FHA because [defendant] (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Mahoney, Oakes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.