Fulton v. Goord

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ADA and RA are not subject to any of the prudential limitations on standing
• recognizing that DOCCS is subject to the ADA and RA
• holding plaintiff with multiple sclerosis had standing to pursue claim under Rehabilitation Act of 1973
• holding plaintiff with multiple sclerosis had standing to pursue claim under Rehabilitation Act of 1973
• explaining that a plaintiff must allege “an injury in fact, by which is meant an invasion of a legally protected interest” (quotation marks omitted)
• recognizing that DOCCS is subject to the ADA and RA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).