Skip to main content

Combs v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 74 S.W.3d 738
  • 2002 WL 1000909

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that trial court should not have “treated [the witness’s] invocation of the privilege against self-incrimination as an ‘all-or-nothing’ decision that barred the witness from testifying at all”
  • witness does not, by testifying to certain matters, waive his/her Fifth Amendment privilege with respect to other, unrelated matters
  • witness does not, by testifying to certain matters, waive his/her Fifth Amendment privilege with respect to other, unrelated matters
  • “[although there are different constitutional concerns at stake” when confrontation as opposed to compulsory process rights are implicated, “prohibiting a witness from testifying or striking the entirety of a witness’s testimony is a ‘drastic remedy not lightly invoked’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Lambert, Cooper, Graves, Johnstone, Stumbo, Wintersheimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.