Kentucky Supreme Court· 6/10/2002
Combs v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 74 S.W.3d 738
- 2002 WL 1000909
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that trial court should not have “treated [the witness’s] invocation of the privilege against self-incrimination as an ‘all-or-nothing’ decision that barred the witness from testifying at all”
- witness does not, by testifying to certain matters, waive his/her Fifth Amendment privilege with respect to other, unrelated matters
- witness does not, by testifying to certain matters, waive his/her Fifth Amendment privilege with respect to other, unrelated matters
- “[although there are different constitutional concerns at stake” when confrontation as opposed to compulsory process rights are implicated, “prohibiting a witness from testifying or striking the entirety of a witness’s testimony is a ‘drastic remedy not lightly invoked’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keller, Lambert, Cooper, Graves, Johnstone, Stumbo, Wintersheimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Adkins v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2003-01-23· cited 146×
- Rodriguez v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2002-10-17· cited 58×
- Varble v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2004-01-22· cited 32×
- Sule v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-21· cited 9×
- Moody v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2005-08-25· cited 6×
- Alexander v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2007-03-30· cited 3×
- S.S. v. Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2025-04-11
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,352×
- United States v. John Cardillo, Lawrence Harris, Ralph Kaminsky, John Knapp, Louis Margolis, and Louis PiselliSecond Circuit· 1963-04-24· cited 261×
- United States v. Anthony Esparsen, United States of America v. Kelly Esparsen, United States of America v. Robert McFaddenTenth Circuit· 1991-04-18· cited 161×
- United States v. Jorge Negrete-Gonzales, United States of America v. Rogelio Mendoza-BarajasNinth Circuit· 1992-06-02· cited 158×
- United States v. Orlando ZapataSeventh Circuit· 1989-02-24· cited 141×
- United States v. David LordNinth Circuit· 1983-07-26· cited 137×
- United States v. Dracy Lamont McKneely Also Known as Green EyesTenth Circuit· 1995-12-05· cited 131×
- Marion Francis Fountain and Roosevelt Tremble v. United States of America, Eugene J. Marshall v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1968-01-08· cited 128×
- Abernathy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1969-02-28· cited 125×
- American Bankers Insurance ex rel. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-01-13· cited 104×
- United States v. GaryFirst Circuit· 1996-01-05· cited 98×
- Theo Ervin Williams v. Robert Borg, WardenNinth Circuit· 1998-03-23· cited 78×
- United States v. BartelhoFirst Circuit· 1997-11-25· cited 76×
- Clarence Eugene Lawson v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of CorrectionsFourth Circuit· 1988-01-25· cited 71×
- United States v. Walter Seifert and Jack EhrlichNinth Circuit· 1980-12-19· cited 68×
- Robert Denham, Jr. v. George Deeds, WardenNinth Circuit· 1992-01-27· cited 68×
- United States v. Albert Juan NunezTenth Circuit· 1982-02-23· cited 62×
- Murphy v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1983-05-11· cited 48×
- United States v. Charles CrawfordTenth Circuit· 1983-06-02· cited 43×
- United States v. Drayton Curry, A/K/A Mr. C.Fourth Circuit· 1993-05-07· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.