Skip to main content
· 1/25/1988

Clarence Eugene Lawson v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

Citations

  • 837 F.2d 653
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 593
  • 1988 WL 3698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Striking all of the testimony of the witness may be the only appropriate remedy when refusal to answer the questions of the cross-examiner frustrates the purpose of the process.\
  • trial court could strike all of defense witness’ testimony when witness curtailed cross-examination by invoking the fifth amendment privilege
  • trial court could strike all of defense witness' testimony when witness curtailed cross- examination by invoking the fifth amendment privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell, Hall, Haynsworth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.