United States v. Orlando Zapata

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the witness’s unanswered questions, which “were directed at [his] prior involvement in drug trafficking,” did not “go to the exculpation of” the defendant and were collateral”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).